MARRIAGE MATTERS
MARRIAGE MATTERS
Julie Lynde Cornerstone Family Council
What’s the big deal?
In the great debate over marriage, confusion reigns over the key question to be answered. The heated rhetoric to which we have all been subjected in one way or another inevitably goes to the personal, private reasons for marrying. Those reasons for which people enter into marriage may be as diverse as the people themselves. Although understandable, these diverse, personal reasons to marry do not answer the question of why a society as a whole should honor marriage. The key question in the marriage debate is this, “ what is the public purpose of marriage?”
In his “reader’s view” in the March 30, 2004 edition of the Idaho Statesman, ACLU attorney Jack vanValkenburgh indicated that in the world of public opinion in this race to solidify the definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman; time was on his side. Jack is right. Pop culture, the press, and the media, are engaged in an all out assault on our notion and sensibilities toward traditional marriage. As time goes on, more political authority figures will engage in anarchy, embolden homosexual activists to thumb their noses at law and tradition. As their numbers mount, so will confusion…and the desensitization will continue.
Like the blissfully unaware frog whose hospitable pool of water slowly heats to the deadly boiling point, it’ll be too late to salvage our culture if we don’t recognize the changes being imposed on our cultural environment. In our affections for our homosexual friends, we will become mired in the muddy rationale of personal reasoning and miss the larger point of the societal impact of marriage.
We need to know. We need to be aware of what it is that makes marriage special and why it should be privileged in public policy.
The PUBLIC purpose of marriage is nothing short of life and death for a civilization.
It is not bigotry to say marriage should be between a man and a woman.
It is not discrimination to say a child needs a mom and a dad.
“We all know that men and women are necessary for the family and that no child should intentionally be denied her mother or father in order to fulfill adult desires. That is why we cannot accept the same-sex family. It serves no public purpose.” Glenn Stanton October 2004 Focus on the Family
- Home
- About Us
- Issues
- Abstinence
- Education
- Gambling
- Hate Crimes
- Homosexuality
- Marriage
- Guide to the Issues:
- Marriage Amendment 2006 HJR 2 Vote
- AN UPDATE FROM CORNERSTONE FAMILY ACTION MARRIAGE AMENDMENT VOTE IN THE SENATE
- Why Children Need a Male and Female Parent
- Importance of Traditional Marriage
- What's the big deal?
- How would "marriage" between homosexuals threaten my heterosexual marriage and family?
- Isn't Banning Gay Marriage Just Like Banning Interracial Marriage?
- Can’t We All Just Get Along By Having Religious Marriage and Civil Marriage?
- Pornography
- Sanctity of Life
- Women's Issues
- Legislative Action
- Capstone
- Links and Resources
- Voter Education Project
- Donate
- Contact Us
Boise ID Weather

Subscribe to Weekly Email Updates
Alliance Defense Fund
- ADF files suit to stop violation of Wis. marriage amendment
- ADF will appeal decision to strike down roadside memorials to fallen Utah troopers
- Ala. seminary freed to issue religious degrees after help from ADF
- 9th Circuit puts brakes on decision that struck down Calif. marriage amendment
- Federal court: Critical aspects of patient safety law in Allen County, Ind. can go into effect
